Jenkin and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1997-170
Members
- S R Maling (Chair)
- J Withers
- L M Loates
- R McLeod
Dated
Complainant
- Douglas Jenkin
Number
1997-170
Programme
MillenniumBroadcaster
Television New Zealand LtdChannel/Station
TV2
Summary
The broadcast of the series Millennium began with the double screening of the first
two episodes on TV2 at 8.30pm on 18 August 1997.
Mr Jenkin complained to the broadcaster, Television New Zealand Ltd, that 8.30pm
was too early for the screening in view of the violence portrayed in the programme.
Further, female sex workers, gay men, and people with HIV, he wrote, were depicted
as inferior and negative stereotypes were reinforced.
Explaining that the programme was clearly labelled AO and preceded with a visual
and verbal warning, TVNZ maintained that it was acceptable for adult viewing at
8.30pm. As the groups referred to were the victims in the horror-thriller, and as they
were treated in a similar way to victims in other such programmes, TVNZ did not
accept that the programme encouraged discrimination against these groups. It
declined to uphold the complaint.
Dissatisfied with TVNZ's decision, Mr Jenkin referred his complaint to the
Broadcasting Standards Authority under s.8(1)(c) of the Broadcasting Act 1989.
For the reasons below, the Authority declines to uphold the complaint.
Decision
The members of the Authority have viewed the item complained about and have read
the correspondence (summarised in the Appendix). In this instance, the Authority
determines the complaint without a formal hearing.
The series Millennium began with a double episode broadcast at 8.30pm on TV2. Mr
Jenkin complained to TVNZ that 8.30pm was too early to screen the programme in
view of the way, first, it treated female sex workers, gay men, and people with HIV as
inferior, and, secondly, the way sex was relentlessly and gratuitously linked to
violence.
TVNZ assessed the complaint under standards G8, G13 and V1 of the Television
Code of Broadcasting Practice. The first two require broadcasters:
G8 To abide by the classification codes and their appropriate time bands as
outlined in the agreed criteria for programme classifications.
G13 To avoid portraying people in a way which represents as inherently
inferior, or is likely to encourage discrimination against, any section of the
community on account of race, age, disability, occupational status, sexual
orientation or the holding of any religious, cultural or political belief.
This requirement is not intended to prevent the broadcast of material
which is:
i) factual, or
ii) the expression of genuinely-held opinion in a news or current
affairs programme, or
iii) in the legitimate context of a humorous, satirical or dramatic work.
The third one reads:
V1 Broadcasters have a responsibility to ensure that any violence shown is
justifiable, ie is essential in the context of the programme.
TVNZ emphasised that the programme was rated AO, and that the AO symbol was
screened at the beginning of the programme and after each commercial break.
Further, it wrote, the broadcast was preceded with a warning – which was delivered
both visually and verbally – about the graphic scenes in the item. By screening this
information, TVNZ maintained, the AO status of the broadcast had been made clear
to viewers who, it argued, must take some responsibility for their viewing practices.
TVNZ acknowledged that later episodes of Millennium had been screened at 9.30pm
However, it insisted, this was a scheduling decision, and not a classification matter. It
did not accept that standard G8 was contravened by the broadcast on 18 August.
As for standard G13, TVNZ said the victims portrayed in Millennium were treated the
same as victims in similar programmes. Turning to standard V1, TVNZ accepted that
the programme's atmosphere was evil and bleak but, it added, actual incidents of
violence were few.
When he referred the complaint to the Authority, Mr Jenkin expressed the opinion
that the later episodes broadcast at 9.30pm had been correctly classified. The
violence depicted, he contended, was unsuitable for broadcast at 8.30pm. He
expressed regret that he had not referred to standards V4 and V6 in his original
complaint.
In its report to the Authority, TVNZ said it was unfair to introduce new standards part
way through the complaints process. Nevertheless, it considered that standard V4 was
not relevant, and insufficient detail had been shown to contravene standard V6. They
read:
V4 The combination of violence and sexuality in a way designed to titillate
must not be shown.
V6 Ingenious devices for and unfamiliar methods of inflicting pain, injuryand death, particularly if capable of easy imitation, must not be shown,
except in exceptional circumstances which are in the public interest.
In his final comment, Mr Jenkin persisted in his opinion that 8.30pm was too early to
screen the programme in view of the violence shown.
The focus of the complaint, and TVNZ's response, is the hour of the broadcast of the
first episodes of Millennium – at 8.30pm. The section of the Television Code dealing
with violence is primarily concerned with the explicit displays of violence. The
Authority agrees with TVNZ that the violence featured in Millennium was
atmospheric and inferred, not revealed by explicit actions, and on those grounds, it
does not accept that standards V1, V4 and V6 were breached. Moreover, it accepts
TVNZ's arguments that the victims were portrayed according to familiar conventions
of thriller/horror programmes. Thus, it does not consider there was a breach of
standard G13.
Returning to the hour of screening, the Authority records TVNZ's use of warnings
and the display of the AO symbol. However, as it has pointed out on past occasions,
such contextual matters are not necessarily sufficient in themselves should the
programme tend towards the end of the range of AO programmes to which children
and young viewers should not be exposed.
On this occasion, the Authority has taken into account the undercurrent of violence
throughout the entirely imaginary programme, which it notes was based on collective
fear. It also welcomes the scheduling decision which resulted in later programmes
being screened at 9.30pm. Nevertheless, on balance, the Authority is of the opinion
that the screening of the first episodes, accompanied by a warning, was not
inappropriate at 8.30pm, and thus was not a breach of standard G8.
For the above reasons, the Authority declines to uphold the complaint.
Signed for and on behalf of the Authority
Sam Maling
Chairperson
15 December 1997
Appendix
Mr Jenkin's Complaint to Television New Zealand Ltd - 2 September 1997
Douglas Jenkin of Wellington complained to Television New Zealand Ltd about the
broadcast of Millennium beginning at 8.30pm on TV2 on 18 August 1997.
Mr Jenkin considered that the programme breached the standards in view of the
violence portrayed, in view of the hour at which it was screened, and in view of the
way it portrayed some groups of people.
In elaborating on his complaint, Mr Jenkin said the programme treated female sex
workers, gay men, and people with HIV as inferior, and reinforced negative
stereotypes against them. Further, he wrote, the programme relentlessly and
gratuitously linked sex with violence.
TVNZ's Response to the Formal Complaint - 16 September 1997
Assessing the complaint under standards G8, G13 and V1 of the Television Code of
Broadcasting Practice, TVNZ began by pointing out that the programme was rated
AO and the AO symbol appeared at the beginning of the programme, and after each
commercial break. Further, the broadcast was preceded with a warning delivered both
verbally and visually, which said:
"Millennium is rated Adults Only. It contains some graphic scenes that may
disturb. We advise discretion".
TVNZ continued:
That then is the context in which we were called upon to consider your
complaint: a programme which we had advised was, in our opinion, suitable
only for viewers over the age of 18 and preceded by a specific warning.
Mr Jenkin had not given a reason for complaining that the programme was
inappropriately scheduled, and TVNZ said, viewers had to accept some responsibility
for their viewing practices. It pointed out that, by the AO classification, TVNZ
unambiguously advised viewers that the programme should be watched only by
people over the age of 18 years.
TVNZ acknowledged that subsequent episodes had been screened at a later hour and
explained that this was a scheduling decision, but conceded that the later episodes
were appropriately screened at that time.
Turning to standard G13, TVNZ said that any crime thriller had to have victims, and
thus the victims portrayed in Millennium were treated the same as victims in other
similar programmes. Nothing in the plot, it added, expressed approval for the killer's
actions.
With regard to standard V1, TVNZ acknowledged that the programme's atmosphere
was evil and bleak, but the actual incidents of violence were few. TVNZ declined to
uphold the complaint.
Mr Jenkin's Referral to the Broadcasting Standards Authority - 30 September
1997
Dissatisfied with TVNZ's decision, Mr Jenkin referred his complaint to the
Broadcasting Standards Authority under s.8(1)(a) of the Broadcasting Act 1989.
Mr Jenkin maintained that the broadcast was "extreme in its depiction of violence".
Picking up TVNZ's point that later episodes were broadcast at 9.30pm, Mr Jenkin
referred specifically to the opening sequence in the episode complaint about. At
8.30pm, the broadcast had showed:
..a female peep show dancer and the scene where the killer picks up men at a
cruising spot [which] links sex with violence in an extended, unhealthy and
exploitative manner.
He expressed regret that he had not referred to standards V4 and V6 in his original
complaint.
TVNZ's Report the Authority - 21 October 1997
In its report to the Authority, TVNZ repeated the point that, in its opinion, the level of
explicit violence in the two hour double episode was "very low". It wrote
The explicit violence is restrained, and the horror (this is after all a horror-
suspense series) is conveyed by implication and dialogue.
Arguing that it was unfair for a complainant to introduce new standards part way
through the complaints process, TVNZ stated nevertheless that it did not consider
standard V4 was relevant. It did not believe standard V6 had been infringed, as
sufficient detail capable of imitation was not shown.
Mr Jenkin's Final Comment - 3 November 1997
TVNZ, Mr Jenkin stated, had attempted to diminish the programme's darker
implications. The victims were subject to discrimination and violence in their daily
lives, and the sadistic acts on the gay men went beyond the "cruel and the unusual".
Mr Jenkin maintained that 8.30pm was too early to screen the programme.