Mead and Lake City 96 FM (Rotorua) - 1997-095
Members
- S R Maling (Chair)
- A Martin
- L M Loates
- R McLeod
Dated
Complainant
- Lee-Ann Mead
Number
1997-095
Programme
Film reviewBroadcaster
Lake City 96 FM (Rotorua)Channel/Station
Lake City 96 FM
Summary
According to a review of the film Matilda broadcast on Lake City 96 FM on 7 April
1997 at 8.50am, the main character's parents were played by Danny de Vito and his
"real-life wife".
Lee-Ann Mead objected to the description of Rhea Pearlman, an acclaimed actress in
her own right, as Danny de Vito's real-life wife. In her view, it would only have been
acceptable to describe her thus if Ms Pearlman had been named. When Lake City 96
FM failed to respond to her complaint, Ms Mead referred it to the Broadcasting
Standards Authority under s.8(1)(b) of the Broadcasting Act 1989.
In its response to the Authority, Lake City 96 FM advised that it believed it had
resolved the matter to Ms Mead's satisfaction by telephone, having apologised to her.
However, the station did not believe the review was offensive, and noted that it was
sourced from the Independent Radio Network. It declined to uphold the complaint.
For the reasons given below, the Authority declines to uphold the complaint.
Decision
The members of the Authority have read the correspondence (summarised in the
Appendix). On this occasion, the Authority determines the complaint without a
formal hearing.
In a review of the video Matilda, broadcast on Lake City 96 FM on 7 April 1997, the
reviewer explained that the main character's parents were played by Danny de Vito
and "his real life wife".
Lee-Ann Mead of Rotorua complained that it was demeaning to Rhea Pearlman to be
described as Danny de Vito's real life wife without herself being named, when she was
an acclaimed actress in her own right and should be recognised for her own skills.
Ms Mead referred her complaint to the Authority when she received no written
response from Lake City FM. In her referral she complained that she had not received
a response from the Station despite phone calls to the Station Manager and an
assurance that her complaint would be dealt with.
When the Authority sought a response from the Station, it appeared that the Station
Manager believed that the matter had been satisfactorily resolved by telephone, when
an apology was given to Ms Meads.
In her final comment, Ms Meads advised that no apology had been made, although she
had discussed the matter with the Station Manager. She considered her complaint was
genuine and legitimate and therefore should have been appropriately dealt with by the
Station.
The Authority assessed the complaint under standard R14 of the Radio Code of
Broadcasting Practice, which requires broadcasters:
R14 To avoid portraying people in a manner that encourages denigration of
or discrimination against any section of the community on account of
gender, race, age, disability, occupation status, sexual orientation or as
the consequence of legitimate expression of religious, cultural or
political beliefs. This requirement is not intended to prevent the
broadcast of material which is
a factual
b the expression of serious opinion, or
c in the legitimate use of humour or satire.
The Authority considers this complaint is concerned with a relatively minor matter
and, although it can understand the complainant's view and her preference for
expressing the relationship between the two actors in another way, it does not
consider that there was a breach of standard R14. Accordingly, it declines to uphold
the complaint.
For the reasons set forth above, the Authority declines to uphold the complaint.
Signed for and on behalf of the Authority
Sam Maling
Chairperson
7 August 1997
Appendix
Lee-Ann Mead's Complaint to Lake City 96 FM - 9 April 1997
Lee-Ann Mead of Rotorua complained to Lake City 96 FM about a video review
which was broadcast on 7 April 1997 at 8.50am.
The review was of the film Matilda, and the reviewer described the main character's
parents as being played by Danny de Vito and "his real-life wife".
Ms Mead objected to Rhea Pearlman, herself an acclaimed actress, being described as
Danny de Vito's real-life wife. In her view, the reviewer devalued both herself and her
skills by not mentioning Ms Pearlman by name. Describing a woman as someone's
real-life wife was, in her view, not an adequate way of describing a woman or her
abilities.
Ms Mead advised that she had attempted to get a copy of the tape but had been
unable to do so. She understood it was prepared by the Independent Radio Network
and that 96 FM was one of many stations in New Zealand which played the review.
Ms Mead's Referral to the Broadcasting Standards Authority - 18 May 1997
When she received no response to her complaint from Lake City 96 FM, Ms Mead
referred it to the Broadcasting Standards Authority under s.8(1)(b) of the Broadcasting
Act 1989.
Ms Mead explained that in spite of phone calls to the Station Manager and a further
written complaint directly to the station, no response had been forthcoming. She
advised that after her last telephone call about 3 or 4 weeks previously, the Station
Manager had promised to listen to the review and advise her of her opinion on it.
Ms Mead believed it made a mockery of the complaints procedures that she had
received no response.
Lake City 96 FM's Response to the Authority - 23 May 1997
The Station Manager reported that she had spoken to Ms Mead on the telephone and
had apologised for the review. She said that Ms Mead had been given the option of
resolving the matter on the telephone or writing a letter. She had chosen to resolve it
by telephone.
The Station Manager advised that the review was an Independent Radio Network line
feed. She did not personally find the review offensive, but did apologise to Ms Mead.
Ms Mead's Final Comment - 3 June 1997
When asked for a brief final comment, Ms Mead responded that she had not received
an apology from the Station Manager with respect to the complaint. She
acknowledged that she had spoken to the Station Manager, but advised that the matter
had not been resolved.
Ms Mead believed her complaint was genuine and legitimate and could have easily
been determined by the Station, had it wanted to.