Alcohol Healthwatch and Health Action and TV3 Network Services Ltd - 1995-026, 1995-027
Members
- I W Gallaway (Chair)
- L M Loates
- W J Fraser
Dated
Complainant
- Alcohol Healthwatch, Health Action
Number
1995-026–027
Programme
Sale of the CenturyBroadcaster
TV3 Network Services LtdChannel/Station
TV3Standards
Summary
Sale of the Century, a game show, is broadcast on TV3 on weekdays from 7.00–
7.30pm. The Auckland Warriors rugby league team was featured on the programme
on Friday 11 November and from Monday to Friday 14–18 November.
The Health Promotion Adviser (Ms Cherry Morgan) for Alcohol Healthwatch
complained to TV3 Network Services Ltd that the programmes contravened the
standards relating to the incidental promotion of liquor. That had occurred through
the extensive display of DB Bitter logos.
For Health Action in Nelson, the Health Promotion Adviser (Ms Liz McPherson)
complained that showing the DB Bitter logos during the programmes during the week
was contrived incidental liquor promotion which breached the standards.
Explaining that the team members had worn their uniforms while on official duty to
promote the team, TV3 declined to uphold the complaints. Dissatisfied with TV3's
decision, Alcohol Healthwatch and Health Action each referred its complaint to the
Broadcasting Standards Authority under s.8(1)(a) of the Broadcasting Act 1989.
For the reasons below, a majority of the Authority declined to uphold the complaints.
Decision
The members of the Authority have viewed the programmes complained about and
have read the correspondence (summarised in the Appendices). As is its practice, the
Authority has determined the complaints without a formal hearing.
On Friday 11 November and from Monday 14 to Friday 18 November some members
of the Auckland Warriors rugby league team appeared on Sale of the Century. A few
members were seen in the opening credits and, at the end of the show, several
members promoted some of the prizes. On a number of occasions, the programme's
presenters exchanged a few words about the team with some of the players. The team
members were wearing playing uniforms and, at the end of the broadcast on 18
November, the presenters were given large membership cards for the supporters' club
carrying the sponsoring liquor company's logo.
In view of the DB Bitter logo apparent on the players' clothing, both complainants
complained to TV3 that the broadcasts involved contrived incidental promotion of
liquor in breach of standard A3 of the Programme Standards for the Promotion of
Liquor. Alcohol Healthwatch also complained that the coverage of the DB Bitter
Warriors Support Club membership cards breached the standard.
Standard A3 reads:
A3 Broadcasters will ensure that the incidental promotion of liquor is
minimised and in particular:
a. Will not be a party to any contract or arrangement where incidental
liquor promotion is a contrived part of the programme.
b. Will ensure that backdrops and props for any in-house studio
programme do not carry liquor promotions (not applicable on radio).
c. Will not unduly focus in a live or on-location event on any particular
advertising signage, logo or any other sound or visual effect which
promotes liquor.
d. Will not broadcast anything which is in breach of section 1, relating
to incidental promotion and saturation, of the Voluntary Sports Code
for Liquor Advertising and Promotion on Television.
It is recognised that incidental liquor promotion occurs from time to time inprogrammes where broadcasters have little or no control over the situation. In
those situations they must minimise the exposure to the best of their ability.
Where broadcasters have control of the situation, they will ensure that the
standards regarding incidental promotion are followed in the spirit as well as the
letter.
TV3 advised the complainants that the Auckland Warriors appeared on the
programme during a special Warriors week:
... to publicise a special prize of the Rugby League Grand Final Tour and to
promote the Auckland Warriors team which enters the New South Wales Rugby
League Winfield Cup competition next year. As a team on official duty they
wore their uniform which incorporates their name and logo, namely the
Auckland DB Bitter Warriors.
It also said that the uniforms and logos had been approved by the appropriate sports
body, that the backdrops did not contain liquor promotion and that the shots of the
players did not unduly focus on the liquor signage or the logo.
In addition, TV3 referred to rules 1.4.2 and 2.f of the Voluntary Sports Code. The
former provides under the heading "Wearing of Apparel on Television":
1.4.2 It is not acceptable for athletes to wear official team apparel –
competition, practice or casual – on special programmes, game shows,
appearances or interviews other than those regarded as official team
duties.
Arguing that the issue was whether the appearances on Sale of the Century were
official team duties, TV3 listed a range of other functions where team members had
appeared wearing competition uniform. TV3 maintained that the appearance of the
Warriors on the game show as hosts – not as contestants – to promote awareness of
the team was clearly an "official team duty".
When Ms Morgan on behalf of Alcohol Healthwatch referred its complaint to the
Authority, she disputed that the appearances were "official team duties" and she also
argued that the appearances of team members each night for a week amounted to the
saturation of incidental liquor promotion in contravention of standard A1.
Dissatisfaction with the "official team duty" explanation was also expressed by Ms
McPherson on behalf of Health Action in Nelson who argued that liquor promotion
during a family show breached the spirit of the Programme Standards if not the letter.
In its report to the Authority on both complaints, TV3 repeated its argument that rule
1.4.2 of the Voluntary Sports Code allowed the players to wear their team uniforms
on an "official team duty". That, it maintained, was the situation which applied to the
members' appearances on Sale of the Century. Quoting a recent article in the "Sunday
Star Times" in its support, TV3 commented:
The Auckland Warriors are a national phenomenon and have generated much
publicity. Their appearance on Sale of the Century was part of the team's
efforts to raise their profile for the upcoming season.
Both complainants responded sharply to this comment. Ms Morgan said the
appearance of the Warriors was principally an example of the Warriors' publicity
process in action and, stressing that TV3 had control of the situation when the
Warriors appeared on the programme, pointed to the provision in standard A3 which
requires the spirit as well as the letter of the standards to be followed in that situation.
Because they were a "national phenomena", Ms McPherson wrote, the Warriors had a
strong appeal to youth and she also noted that TV3 was required to follow the
standard's spirit because it had control of the material which was broadcast.
The Authority decided to approach the complaint in the following way. First,
because the saturation aspect of the complaint (standard A1) was raised explicitly
only when Alcohol Healthwatch referred its complaint, the Authority decided that it
was unable to accept that aspect of the referral under s.7(3) of the Act which provides
that its function is to investigate and review a broadcaster's decision. The Authority
would add, nevertheless, that standard A1 refers to saturation within "a viewing
period". In this case, that would refer to each of the six incidental Sale of the Century
programmes and, in the Authority's opinion particularly as shots of the players did
not focus on the logos, the extent and number of the appearances of the logo during
each programme did not amount to saturation.
Both complainants maintained that standard A3 had been breached and each referred
to the contrived nature of the promotion. The Authority regards the introductory
sentence of the standard as the principle to be followed and points (a) to (d) refer to
specific circumstances. Although the reference to a "contrivance" in the complaints
could suggest that the complaint focussed on A3.a, the Authority has proceeded on
the basis that the complaints alleged that the incidental promotion of liquor was not
minimised in the episodes of Sale of the Century referred to.
In interpreting standard A3, the Authority has had regard to the footnote which, the
complainants pointed out, requires conscientious compliance when the broadcaster
has control of the situation as it had on Sale of the Century.
The Authority next considered under what name the team was known, and then how
it was described during the broadcast. It concluded that in common usage the team
appeared to be known as the Warriors or the Auckland Warriors. Only occasionally
are they given their full name in the media and, in the programmes complained about,
they were usually described just as the Warriors. As there were minimal verbal
references to DB Bitter during the broadcast, the Authority considered the complaint
about incidental liquor promotion was confined to the liquor logos which were seen on
the uniforms.
In studying the shots of the players, the Authority accepted that TV3 had tried to
minimise the exposure of the liquor logos.
Members of the Authority disagreed on the final matter raised by the complaint, ie
whether the broadcast complied with the provision in the footnote of standard A3
which requires broadcasters to follow the standards in spirit in addition to the letter
when it has control of the situation which is being broadcast.
The majority decided that TV3 was entitled to refer to rule 1.4.2 of the Voluntary
Sports Code when considering the application of the footnote although it was not
raised by the complainants. In view of its heading – "Wearing of Apparel on
Television" – and its reference to game shows and as standard A3.d refers specifically
to the Voluntary Sports Code, the majority concluded that TV3 was entitled to follow
the guidance contained in the rule. The rule accepts that athletes can wear competition
apparel when they are appearing on official team duty. As the members of the
Warriors who appeared on Sale of the Century – other than the coach and captain –
were not individually named and as they participated together rather than as
individuals, the majority came to the conclusion that their appearance on Sale of the
Century was an official team duty.
Taking into account this conclusion along with the title by which the team was
referred to during the programme, and the apparent efforts to limit the shots which
focussed on the logos, the majority decided that, as the incidental liquor had been
minimised, standard A3 had not been breached.
The minority disagreed. As TV3 had control of the situation in which the Warriors
were seen, it regarded the provision in the footnote in standard A3 as being of
overriding importance. The broadcaster had total control of the situation and therefore
there is no qualification such as "minimising exposure to the best of their ability" and
no diminished responsibility. In these circumstances the broadcaster could well have
been party to a contract or arrangement where liquor promotion in the form of the
logos on the jerseys and large membership cards was a contrived part of the
programme. The minority regarded TV3's reference to rule 1.4.2 of the Voluntary
Sports Code as resorting to what might be considered a loophole. The use of the
loophole amounted to an evasion of the rule which the minority considered was an
inappropriate approach for broadcasters and sponsors to adopt. The footnote to
standard A3 requires broadcasters to ensure that the standards regarding incidental
promotions are followed in the spirit as well as in the letter when it has control of the
situation. The minority believed that this was a serious breach of the spirit of the
standards.
For the reasons given above, a majority of the Authority declines to uphold the
complaint.
The Authority states that it was never contemplated that "official team duties" would
include sports people wearing team playing gear participating in game shows in family
viewing time and gives notice that if the Voluntary Sports Code is not amended
immediately to ensure that this reason cannot be used again, it will take steps to
amend its own standards to prevent a recurrence of this nature.
Signed for and on behalf of the Authority
Iain Gallaway
Chairperson
11 May 1995
Appendix I
Alcohol Healthwatch's Complaint to TV3 Network Services Ltd - 23 November 1994
Ms Cherry Morgan, Health Promotion Adviser for Alcohol Healthwatch, complained
to TV3 Network Services Ltd about the appearance of the Auckland Warrior rugby
league team in the promo for Sale of the Century and during the programme itself on 18
November.
Noting that the team members were wearing sports gear "emblazoned with DB Bitter
logos" and that there was promotion of the DB Bitter Warriors supporters club, Ms
Morgan wrote:
I believe this is a breach of Additional Standards A3 of the Code for Advertising
Liquor. The codes state that broadcasters will ensure that incidental promotion
is minimised and not be contrived. It is clearly a contrived situation and is
blatant incidental advertising promoting a beer brand using well known heroes of
the young.
She also expressed concern that team members wearing liquor logos on their sports
gear had featured each night on Sale of the Century during the preceding week.
TV3's Response to the Formal Complaint - 21 December 1994
TV3 began by pointing out that the programme complained about was broadcast
during a "Warriors Week" to publicise a prize for the Rugby League Winfield Cup
Grand Final and to promote the team. It continued:
As a team on official duty they wore their uniform which incorporates their
name and logo, namely the Auckland DB Bitter Warriors.
It also pointed out that the uniform had been approved by the appropriate sports and
advertising bodies, that the shots did not unduly focus on the logos and that the
backdrops did not contain liquor promotion. TV3 also referred to the Voluntary
Sports Code which accepted that athletes could wear team apparel on game shows
provided it was part of an official team duty.
In assessing whether the appearance of team members on Sale of the Century was an
official team duty, TV3 referred to the extensive number and range of functions the
players were participating in to promote the team,. It also pointed out that they
appeared on the show as hosts - not contestants - and maintained that their
appearance was an official team duty. It declined to uphold the complaint.
Alcohol Healthwatch's Complaint to the Broadcasting Standards Authority - 26
January
Dissatisfied with TV3's response, Ms Morgan on Alcohol Healthwatch's behalf
referred the complaint to the Broadcasting Standards Authority under s.8(1)(a) of the
Broadcasting Act 1989. She was dissatisfied with TV3's decision as the broadcasts in
prime time involved the promotion of both the team and DB Bitter and was not an
official team duty.
In addition to the complaint that the broadcast breached standard A3, the Ms Morgan
maintained that it breached the saturation prohibition in standard A1. She
acknowledged that the letter of complaint had not specifically referred to this standard
but argued that it was implied by the reference to the appearance of the Warriors each
evening for a week.
TV3's Response to the Authority - 20 February 1994
In its report to the Authority, TV3 said that members of the Auckland Warriors had
appeared on the game show Sale of the Century on Friday 11 November and during the
following week 14 - 18 November. Repeating its explanation for the team's
appearance given to the complainant, TV3 maintained that the footage did not
"unduly focus" on the sponsor's logos and that as the team was an official duty, the
members were allowed by rule 1.4.2 of the Voluntary Sports Code to wear their
uniforms.
TV3 also quoted a recent article in the "Sunday Star Times" which described the
Warriors as a "national phenomenon" and wrote:
To suggest that the team was not on official duty as part of the Sale of the
Century programme one must take a very narrow view of professional sports
marketing. The Code of Broadcasting Practice sets out appropriate guidelines
for the exposure of liquor logos and uniforms. The Auckland Warriors players
uniforms comply with these guidelines. Therefore, any incidental exposure
cannot be considered contrived as per A3.a of the existing Code.
TV3 concluded:
On Sale of the Century, although the Auckland Warriors featured as a significant
part of the programme (over 14.5 minutes during the three hours of the
programming), the actual sponsors logo was visible for only about 2% of this
time as the producer was careful to minimise the incidental exposure. For these
reasons, the complaint was not upheld as the exposure is within the guidelines
of A3 and Section 1 of the Voluntary Sports Code.
Alcohol Healthwatch's Final Comment to the Authority - 3 March 1995
When asked to comment on TV3's reply, on behalf of Alcohol Healthwatch Ms
Morgan noted that the complaint referred to the broadcast of Sale of the Century on
Friday November 18.
Ms Morgan pointed out that the newspaper article which referred to the Warriors as a
phenomenon, added that it was such because of its marketing machine which never
passed an opportunity for publicity. She continued:
The use of television programming, in this case an entire week of the (DB Bitter)
Warriors on Sale of the Century, is yet another example of the "never miss an
opportunity for publicity".
Referring to the requirements in standard A3 both to minimise the incidental
promotion of liquor and to follow the standards in spirit when a broadcaster had
control of the situation, Ms Morgan wrote:
The Warriors' appearance on Sale of the Century was an organised exercise and I
understand the programme is pre-recorded. The Broadcasters had complete
control of the programme and have not ensured that liquor promotion was
minimised. The programme included extensive coverage of DB Bitter logos on
clothing and large membership cards presented to the hosts of the programme
also featured prominent DB Bitter logos.
Arguing that promotion of the team could have occurred without the promotion of
alcohol if the logos had been eliminated on a family oriented programme, Ms Morgan
said that the amount of liquor promotion, rather than being minimised, had involved
saturation.
Appendix II
Health Action - Nelson's Complaint to TV3 Network Services Ltd - 17
November 1994
Ms Liz McPherson, Health Promotion Adviser for Health Action in Nelson,
complained to TV3 Network Services Ltd about the programme Sale of the Century
which is broadcast each week from Monday to Friday between 7.00 - 7.30pm.
She believed standard A3 of the Promotion of Liquor standards had been breached
during the broadcast on Monday 14 November and the following days of the week as:
The show contained segments of incidental promotion of liquor as a contrived
part of the programme by including members of the Auckland Warriors rugby
team with DB Bitter logos on the front and back of their sweatshirts.
TV3's Response to the Formal Complaint - 21 December 1994
Referring to standard A3 under which the complaint about the show during the week
14 - 18 November had been assessed, TV3 wrote:
The programme you complain about was part of our special WARRIORS
WEEK where the Auckland Warriors appeared on the show in official capacity
as "the Auckland Warriors" Team to publicise a special prize of the Rugby
League Grand Final Tour and to promote the Auckland Warriors team which
enters the New South Wales Rugby League Winfield Cup competition next year.
As a team on official duty they wore their uniform which incorporates their
name and logo, namely the Auckland DB Bitter Warriors.
TV3 then pointed out that the uniforms had been approved by the appropriate sports
bodies, that the backdrops did not contain liquor promotion and that the shots of the
players did not unduly focus on the logos. TV3 also noted that rules 1.4.2 and 2.f of
the Voluntary Sports Code accepted that athletes could wear official team apparel on
game shows provided that the appearance was an official team duty.
As to whether the appearances on Sale of the Century was an official team duty, TV3
pointed out that publicity was the reason for the appearances and it listed a number of
other official functions in November at which the team had also appeared in uniform.
Declining to uphold the complaint, TV3 concluded:
These [other] appearances were not broadcast functions, however, it illustrates
the principle that it is quite common for the team to appear in uniform at official
team duties and that these team duties are aimed at generating public awareness
about the upcoming season.
Health Action's Complaint to the Broadcasting Standards Authority - 7
February 1995
Dissatisfied with TV3's response, on behalf of Health Action Ms McPherson referred
the complaint to the Broadcasting Standards Authority under s.8(1)(a) of the
Broadcasting Act 1989.
Pointing out that members of the Auckland Warriors team members wearing uniforms
had been extensively involved in modelling prizes, Ms McPherson said that they were
"a very visible and significant part of the programme". She maintained that the
broadcasts had breached the standard as incidental liquor promotion had occurred in a
programme over which TV3 had control. She also emphasised the aspect of standard
A3 which requires broadcasters, when they have control of the situation, to follow the
standards in the spirit as well as the letter.
TV3's Response to the Authority - 20 February 1995
In its report to the Authority, TV3 said that members of the Auckland Warriors had
appeared on the game show Sale of the Century on Friday 11 November and during the
following week 14 - 18 November. Repeating its explanation for the team's
appearance given to the complainant, TV3 maintained that the footage did not
"unduly focus" on the sponsor's logos and that as the team was an official duty, the
members were allowed by rule 1.4.2 of the Voluntary Sports Code to wear their
uniforms.
TV3 also quoted a recent article in the "Sunday Star Times" which described the
Warriors as a "national phenomenon" and wrote:
To suggest that the team was not on official duty as part of the Sale of the
Century programme one must take a very narrow view of professional sports
marketing. The Code of Broadcasting Practice sets out appropriate guidelines
for the exposure of liquor logos and uniforms. The Auckland Warriors players
uniforms comply with these guidelines. Therefore, any incidental exposure
cannot be considered contrived as per A3.a of the existing Code.
TV3 concluded:
On Sale of the Century, although the Auckland Warriors featured as a significant
part of the programme (over 14.5 minutes during the three hours of the
programming), the actual sponsors logo was visible for only about 2% of this
time as the producer was careful to minimise the incidental exposure. For these
reasons, the complaint was not upheld as the exposure is within the guidelines
of A3 and Section 1 of the Voluntary Sports Code.
Health Action's Final Comment to the Authority -3 March 1995
On Health Action's behalf, in her response Ms McPherson argued that TV3's
comments explained the basis for the complaint. Because the Warriors were a
"national phenomenon", they had a strong appeal to youth. In deliberately deciding
to include the Warriors on Sale of the Century, she said, TV3 had not minimised the
incidental promotion of liquor in a situation over which it had control.