Soeteman and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1994-027
Members
- I W Gallaway (Chair)
- J R Morris
- L M Dawson
- R A Barraclough
Dated
Complainant
- Adolf Soeteman
Number
1994-027
Programme
Crazy PeopleBroadcaster
Television New Zealand LtdChannel/Station
TV2
Summary
Crazy People was the title of the film screened on Channel 2 at 8.30pm on 17 February 1994.
Mr Soeteman complained to Television New Zealand Ltd that the repeated use of the word
"fuck" during the broadcast was offensive and breached the broadcasting standard
requiring good taste and decency.
Pointing out that the standard required context to be taken into account, TVNZ
maintained that the use of the word on two occasions in the film did not contravene the
standard. In addition, the film had been screened in "AO" time and had been preceded by a
warning about language and, it maintained, the use of the word complained about had
not been gratuitous. Dissatisfied with TVNZ's decision, Mr Soeteman referred his
complaint to the Broadcasting Standards Authority under s.8(1)(a) of the Broadcasting
Act 1989.
For the reasons given below, the Authority declined to uphold the complaint.
Decision
The members of the Authority have viewed the item complained about and have read the
correspondence (summarised in the Appendix). As is its practice, the Authority has
determined the complaint without a formal hearing.
Mr Adolf Soeteman complained to TVNZ about the offensive language in the film Crazy
People broadcast on Channel 2 at 8.30pm on Thursday 17 February. To hear the word
"fuck" repeated a number of times, he continued, breached the standard which states that
broadcasters must observe good taste and decency.
TVNZ assessed the complaint under standard G2 of the Television Code of Broadcasting
Practice which requires broadcasters:
G2 To take into consideration currently accepted norms of decency and taste
in language and behaviour, bearing in mind the context in which any
language or behaviour occurs.
It noted that the word complained about had been used twice in the film and was essential
to explain the context in which the film's hero was dismissed by his employer. Pointing out
that its concern about the gratuitous use of bad language had resulted in 353 deletions
from programmes in 1993, TVNZ maintained that its removal on this occasion would
have substantially detracted from the film's theme about different styles of advertising.
Citing the Authority's Decision No: 164/93 where the use of the word "fuck" was accepted
in context, TVNZ said that the same reasoning justified its use on this occasion. TVNZ later
advised the Authority that the film was broadcast in "AO" time and had been preceded
with a warning about language.
When dealing with a complaint about language used in a broadcast, the Authority, as
required by standard G2, examines the context of the language use. On this occasion it
noted the time of the screening and the warning but, in compliance with the standard,
paid particular attention to the situation in the programme in which it was used. The film
dealt broadly with advertising styles and the film's hero was dismissed following the
accidental publication of an advertisement which adopted a different approach and which
contained the word "fuck". It was a pivotal point in the film and its omission would have
seriously hampered the flow of the story being told.
In those circumstances, the Authority concluded that the use on two occasions of the
language complained about did not, having regard to the context in which it was used,
breach standard G2 of the Television Code of Broadcasting Practice.
For the reasons set forth above, the Authority declines to uphold the complaint.
Despite declining to uphold this complaint, the Authority notes that this is the second
complaint concerning the use of this word within a fortnight. The fact that neither
complaint has been upheld should not be taken as an indication that the Authority is
relaxing its attitude to the use of this word which is highly offensive to a significant
number of viewers, particularly at the relatively early hour of 8.30pm.
Signed for and on behalf of the Authority
Iain Gallaway
Chairperson
9 May 1994
Appendix
Mr Soeteman's Complaint to Television New Zealand Limited
In a letter dated 9 March 1993, Mr Adolf Soeteman of Auckland complained to Television
New Zealand Ltd about the offensive language contained in the movie Crazy People
screened on Channel Two at 8.30pm on Thursday 17 February.
He objected to the use of the word "fuck", which he described as foul language and which
had been repeated on a number of occasions. He believed that the broadcast contravened
the broadcasting standard which requires good taste and decency.
TVNZ's Response to the Formal Complaint
TVNZ advised Mr Soeteman of its Complaints Committee's decision in a letter dated 4
March 1994 and reported that the complaint had been assessed under standard G2 of the
Television Code of Broadcasting Practice.
TVNZ said that the word "fuck" was used twice in the film and explained that the context
was the film's hero being dismissed by his employer. It noted that the gratuitous use of bad
language, or its use during children's normally accepted viewing times, had resulted in
353 deletions from programmes in 1993.
Pointing out that context was taken into account as required by the standard, TVNZ
argued that its deletion would have required the removal of about a third of the sequence
in which the words had been used and
... would substantially diminish the impression given about the crass nature of the
advertisements that had found their way into print.
Moreover, a later scene which referred to the scene in question would also have had to
have been removed.
Expressing the opinion that "bleeping" offending words was not successful in that it drew
attention to the language involved, TVNZ then quoted from the Broadcasting Standards
Authority's Decision No: 164/93. On that occasion, the Authority accepted that the use
of the word "fuck" was appropriate given the context of the film in which it had been used.
As it believed that it was also appropriate on this occasion, TVNZ declined to uphold the
complaint.
Mr Soeteman's Complaint to the Broadcasting Standards Authority
Dissatisfied with TVNZ's decision, in a letter dated 8 March 1994 Mr Soeteman referred
his complaint to the Broadcasting Standards Authority under s.8(1)(a) of the Broadcasting
Act 1989 for investigation and review.
TVNZ's Response to the Authority
As is its practice, the Authority sought the broadcaster's response to the referral. Its letter
is dated 11 March 1994 and TVNZ, in its reply dated 15 March, said it did not want to
comment further other than to emphasise that the film had a S2030 classification (to be
broadcast only in "AO" evening time) and had been preceded by a warning about
language.
Mr Soeteman's Final Comment to the Authority
When asked to comment on TVNZ's response, in a letter dated 23 March 1994 Mr
Soeteman maintained that the use of obscene language in the film Crazy People did not
comply with standard G2. He knew only one person - out of hundreds - who used the
language included in the film.
He considered TVNZ's attitude - that "anything goes in the name of art" - to be
irresponsible.