Complaint under section 8(1)(a) of the Broadcasting Act 1989
Solid Gold Radio – announcement that station going off-air due to “atmospheric conditions” – allegedly inaccurate
Principle 5 (accuracy) – accuracy principle does not apply – not upheld
This headnote does not form part of the decision.
 On 8 September 2005 at 11.40am, Solid Gold FM advised listeners that programmes would be interrupted at midday due to “atmospheric conditions”.
 Mr Pearson complained that the event causing the interruption was a “sun transit”, and the announcement was inaccurate.
 CanWest did not assess the complaint with reference to the Radio Code of Broadcasting Practice.
 CanWest asserted that the announcer was simply acknowledging the interruption to the programme. It maintained that there was no need for the announcer to give a more detailed description.
 Mr Pearson referred the matter to the Authority, stating that the announcer had made a definite statement that atmospheric conditions were responsible, “even though the announcer was not really sure what it was about”.
 The members of the Authority have read the correspondence listed in the Appendix. The Authority determines the complaint without a formal hearing.
 The Authority notes that the complaint was referred under Principle 5 (accuracy). Principle 5 applies only to news, current affairs and factual programmes. The Authority notes that the subject of the complaint was an administrative announcement, and thus does not fall under Principle 5.
For the above reasons the Authority declines to uphold the complaint.
Signed for and on behalf of the Authority
1 November 2005
The following correspondence was received and considered by the Authority when it determined this complaint: