What Not to Swear: The Acceptability of Words in Broadcasting, 2010
Warning!
These reports and this page contain language that some people will find offensive!
Download PDFs:
What Not to Swear: The Acceptability of Words in Broadcasting, Report
What Not to Swear: The Acceptability of Words in Broadcasting, Chart
Date published: 2010
Research Company: Nielsen Corporation
Scope
- Quantitative research to provide a monitor of the acceptability of the use of swear words, blasphemies and other expletives in broadcasting
- Focuses on free-to-air rather than pay-to-view broadcasting
Methodology
- Administered national survey with 1,500 randomly selected individuals aged 18 years and over
- Online methodology survey as differentiated from the 1999 and 2005 surveys which made use of a face-to-face interview technique
Results
- 31 words presented to respondents, 23 included in the 2005 survey and eight new words or phrases: Jesus Fucking Christ, Get Fucked, Fuck off, Faggot, Retard, Slut, Jesus and Piss off
- Respondents rated eight words as Totally or Fairly unacceptable in relation to the scenario of a television drama shown after 8:30pm – Cunt (74%), Nigger (66%), Mother Fucker (66%), Jesus Fucking Christ (65%), Cocksucker (60%), Get fucked (55%), Fuck off (52%) and Fuck (51%)
- The least contentious words, rated as Totally or Fairly acceptable were: Bugger (11%), Bloody (12%) and Bollocks (12%)
- The order of the words found to be the most offensive to the least offensive remain largely the same as found in 2005 and in 1999
- 6 of the 8 words added in 2009 ranked among the top 12 most unacceptable words, except for Jesus and Piss off
- 14 of the 23 words included in both the 2005 and 2009 surveys had statistically significant decrease in the proportion who finds these words unacceptable in the scenario in question
- Similar trend existed between the 1999 and 2005 surveys, 12 of 23 words experienced a significant decrease
- These 14 words are: Fuck, Whore, Arsehole, Jesus Christ, Prick, Bitch, Bastard, Shit, Balls, Bullshit, Crap, Bollocks, Bloody and Bugger
- This indicates a continuing trend of softening of attitudes to the use of certain swear words in broadcasting, particularly to those words that are less contentious
- The word Cunt remains unacceptable to a large majority of New Zealanders (74%)
- When comparing the different demographic groups, it is evident that:
- Males tend to be more accepting of words than females
- Younger respondents tend to be more accepting than older respondents
- Those that state they have no religion tend to be more accepting than those of religious belief
- Those of NZ European ethnicity are generally more accepting than those in the Maori, Pacific Island and Asian ethnic groups
- In 2009, respondents were asked to consider the acceptability of words in 10 different contexts. Some notable patterns that emerged were:
- Use of ‘bad’ language by radio hosts, in both breakfast programmes and talkback scenarios, is less acceptable than in other scenarios
- There appears less tolerance for use of ‘bad’ language from real people (as opposed to actors), including interviewees and callers to radio talkback
- ‘Bad’ language tends to be more acceptable when used after 8:30pm than before 8:30pm
- There was no differentiation made by respondents in relation to acceptability of such language in general between:
- Songs played on radio and music videos in television
- Radio host in a breakfast programme and radio host in talkback
- The majority (68%) hold the same views in relation to acceptability of language, irrespective of whether a broadcast is free-to-air or pay-to-view