The ZM Morning Crew hosts ran a competition called “Racial Profiling”, in which the hosts and a contestant were asked to decide whether individuals who had committed certain offences in the United States were “black, white or Asian”. The Authority did not uphold the complaint that this breached the good taste and decency, and discrimination and denigration standards: on the face of it the game perpetuated racial stereotypes but the outcome as broadcast demonstrated flaws in stereotyping, and freedom of expression outweighed the potential harm caused; and the broadcast did not encourage denigration or discrimination, but was an attempt at humour and satire which are recognised as important freedoms of speech.
Not Upheld: Good Taste and Decency, Discrimination and Denigration
The first episode of The GC, a reality television series following a group of young Māori living on the Gold Coast in Australia, was broadcast on TV3. The Authority did not uphold the complaint that the programme breached the law and order and children’s interests standards: participants were of legal age to drink and were not shown drinking excessively, and it did not encourage viewers to break the law or otherwise promote, glamorise or condone criminal activity; it was correctly rated PGR and the classification was sufficient to advise parental supervision so no additional warning was required – the sexual references were sufficiently inexplicit, the programme would not have disturbed or alarmed child viewers and the content did not warrant a higher classification of Adults Only.
Not Upheld: Law and Order, Children’s Interests
An item on 3 News reported new details relating to a New Zealand man who raped and murdered a hitchhiker from the Czech Republic. It included an interview with the victim’s former employer, and the interviewee and reporter both used the term “nutters”. The Authority did not uphold the complaint that this breached standards relating to good taste and decency, law and order, accuracy, fairness, discrimination and denigration, and responsible programming: the term “nutters” was used to refer to a person who is dangerous and deranged, and was not intended to comment on people with mental illness; the item did not encourage the denigration of, or discrimination against, people with mental illness as a section of the community, and given the contextual factors viewers would have understood the intended meaning of “nutters”.
Not Upheld: Good Taste and Decency, Law and Order, Accuracy, Fairness, Discrimination and Denigration, Responsible Programming
An item on Close Up, broadcast on TV One, profiled the complainant and introduced him by referring to some of his previous complaints, including “that a One News isobar on the weather map was a subliminal advertisement for the movie Shrek”, and that he “complained to the Wellington City Council that its fireworks displays contained phallic symbols”. The Authority did not uphold the complaint that the item breached the accuracy and fairness standards: the item did not suggest that all or most of Mr McDonald’s complaints were unfounded but that he complained “too often about too little”; it provided a context to the complaints, and the complainant was able to put forward his own perspective. Accuracy was subsumed into the Authority’s discussion of fairness.
Not Upheld: Fairness
Subsumed: Accuracy (into Fairness)
An episode of the cartoon comedy South Park was broadcast on FOUR at 9.30pm. It depicted Queen Elizabeth II committing suicide, following a botched terrorism attempt; the episode was rated Adults Only (AO) and was preceded by a visual and verbal warning. The Authority did not uphold the complaint that the episode breached the good taste and decency standard: the episode used parody and satire to comment on politics, and freedom of expression includes the right to satirise public figures; and the content was acceptable during an AO programme screened at 9.30pm.
Not Upheld: Good Taste and Decency
An item on TV3’s 60 Minutes told the story of a New Zealander who murdered his girlfriend in Sydney in 1987 and turned himself in to police 24 years later. It included very brief footage of the front porch of the complainant’s house and incorrectly implied that this was where the murder had taken place. The Authority did not uphold the complaint that the item breached standards relating to the privacy, accuracy, fairness, and responsible programming standards: the complainant was not identifiable through the footage of her house; while the footage and the implication that the house was the scene of a murder were inaccurate, this was immaterial to the focus of the item, so viewers would not have been misled in any significant respect; the complainant did not take part and was not referred to in the item; and the responsible programming standard was not applicable.
Not Upheld: Privacy, Accuracy, Fairness, Responsible Programming
During a segment called “Ideas” on Sunday Morning with Chris Laidlaw, broadcast on Radio New Zealand National, the host interviewed a professor about his creative writing course and about writers and the writing community in general; the professor made comments about a “generation” of New Zealand poets, including A.R.D Fairburn and Denis Glover. The Authority did not uphold the complaint that the programme breached the controversial issues, accuracy and fairness standards: the comments did not form part of a “factual programme”, so the controversial issues standard did not apply; this episode of “Ideas” was not “factual programming” to which the accuracy standard applied, and in any event the professor’s comments amounted to his personal opinion and were therefore exempt from standards of accuracy; and the fairness standard only applies to individuals and organisations – it does not apply to people who are deceased, or to a “generation of poets”.
Not Upheld: Controversial Issues, Accuracy, Fairness
Items on 1XX News, broadcast on One-Double-X, reported on repeat complaints about campaign overspending by the successful candidate in the 2010 Whakatane local body elections and stated: “Detective Inspector [name] says the Independent Police Conduct Authority determined [the police] investigation was thorough and followed correct procedure. The Ombudsman backed this up.” The Authority did not uphold the complaint that this breached the controversial issues and accuracy standards: the focus of the item was the repeat complaints and not the adequacy or otherwise of the police investigation into overspending and the brief news updates did not amount to a discussion of a controversial issue of public importance; the statement was not a material point of fact but was clearly attributed to the detective inspector and reflected the contents of the police press release, and the distinction between “thorough” and “adequate” was not material.
Not Upheld: Controversial Issues, Accuracy
An item on Campbell Live, broadcast on TV3, reported on voluntary euthanasia in the context of New Zealand law. The item included interviews with two strong advocates of euthanasia. Taking into account the focus of the item and the nature of issue, the Authority did not uphold the complaint that it breached the controversial issues standard: euthanasia is a controversial issue of public importance, and the item did not purport to discuss all the arguments for and against euthanasia but was presented from the perspective of one of the advocates. Euthanasia is a long-running moral issue with an ongoing period of current interest, and alternative viewpoints were adequately included.
Not Upheld: Controversial Issues
During the All Night Programme, broadcast on Radio New Zealand National, a guest reviewed a book called Himmler’s brain is called Heydrich, which was about the assassination of Nazi leader Reinhard Heydrich by Czech patriots during World War II. The Authority did not uphold the complaint that the review breached the good taste and decency standard: the review did not minimise the horror of the Holocaust or the events depicted in the novel, and the book was presented as an historical fictional novel that was a blend of fact and fiction.
Not Upheld: Good Taste and Decency