BSA Decisions Ngā Whakatau a te Mana Whanonga Kaipāho

All BSA's decisions on complaints 1990-present
All Decisions
Thomson and TVWorks Ltd - 2011-017

Taken. Movie contained violent scenes. Not upheld (good taste and decency, children’s interests and violence).

Hashimoto and RadioWorks Ltd - 2011-042

Radio Live Drive. Host referred to “dirty Germans” who had stolen native geckos. Not upheld (good taste and decency, and discrimination and denigration).

Field and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2011-027

IRB Sevens World Series. Presenter used the term “MILFs”. Not upheld (good taste and decency).

Madsen and TVWorks Ltd - 2011-023

Promo for Glee. Male character in a wheelchair said, “I want to be very clear, I still have the use of my penis”. Not upheld (good taste and decency).

O'Halloran and RadioWorks Ltd - 2011-021

Martin Crump Late Night Live. Stand-in host encouraged running over possums. Not upheld (good taste and decency, law and order, and fairness).

Berry and RadioWorks Ltd - 2011-018

Willie and JT. Hosts joked that Prime Minister had polio. Not upheld (good taste and decency).

Harrison and TVWorks Ltd - 2011-022

7 Days. Allegedly offensive language. Not upheld (good taste and decency).

Leo and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2011-015

Promo for Castle. Contained comments, “a big time slugger gets whacked”, and “someone used his head for batting practice”. Not upheld (children’s interests).

Adams, Godinet and Parsons and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2010-145

Breakfast. Presenter deliberately mispronounced the name of the Chief Minister of Delhi. Upheld (good taste and decency, fairness and discrimination and denigration): action taken. Not upheld (responsible programming). Orders (broadcast statement, $3,000 costs to Crown).

Minogue and RadioWorks Ltd - 2011-024

News items broadcast simultaneously on The Breeze and Coromandel Gold FM two days running made allegations against a mayoral candidate for the Thames-Coromandel District Council over an email he had circulated; they used the terms “doctored”, “doctoring” and “falsify”. The candidate made a complaint under the accuracy and fairness standards. The Authority declined to uphold either complaint: the terms used were distinguishable as the opinion of his political rivals and were exempt from accuracy under guideline 5a; and the candidate had been given an adequate opportunity to respond, so had been treated fairly.

Not Upheld: Accuracy, Fairness

1 ... 170 171 172 ... 449