Skip to main content

Today we released decisions on two complaints, one of which was partially upheld under the accuracy standard. This complaint related to an item on Te Karere about Green MP Marama Davidson’s protest trip to Gaza, and in particular the reporter’s reference to Israel’s ‘illegal’ blockade at Gaza.

The other complaint was about a Story item which discussed the accountability of judges in New Zealand. The Authority did not uphold the complaint, finding that the accountability of New Zealand’s judiciary was an issue of public interest, and that the item was a valuable exercise of the broadcaster’s right to freedom of expression.

You can read the BSA’s media release on this decision here.

For the full decisions, click on the Latest Decisions button below.

Today we released decisions on four complaints, none of which were upheld.

Two complaints related to the promotion of adult programmes during family television viewing times. The BSA emphasised that under the broadcasting codes of practice “broadcasters are able to promote AO programmes during G programmes, provided the content of the promo meets the requirements of the G classification”. In these particular cases, the BSA found that while the promos were for programmes targeted at adults, the content of the promos was consistent with expectations of a family viewing timeslot and did not contain any graphic or explicit adult material.

You can read our media release on these two decisions here.

For the full decisions click on the Latest Decisions button below.

Today we released decisions on two complaints.

One of the complaints related to an episode of Nigel Latta’s documentary series, The Hard Stuff, which focused on New Zealand’s economy. The other complaint related to a comment made by radio host Leighton Smith about the Pope.

The Authority did not uphold either of these complaints. 

For the full decisions, click on the Latest Decisions button below.

Today we released decisions on two complaints, neither of which was upheld.

One of the complaints alleged that an episode of the documentary series The Hard Stuff with Nigel Latta, which focused on immigration, lacked balance by not presenting alternative points of view. The Authority found this episode carried high public interest and had high value in terms of freedom of expression. It considered the episode, which was clearly presented from the host’s perspective, sufficiently acknowledged other viewpoints and enabled viewers to make up their own minds about the validity of the arguments offered in favour of, and against, immigration.

For the full decisions, click on the Latest Decisions button below.

Today we released decisions on five complaints, none of which were upheld.

Four of the complaints related to television programmes, and one complaint related to a radio programme.

Two of the complaints alleged that broadcasts had breached the law and order standard. The Authority found in both cases that this standard was not breached, as neither programme promoted or condoned illegal activity. Viewers would not have interpreted either programme as seriously encouraging or instructing them to engage in criminal behaviour.