Search Rapua

Search Decisions
Broadcast Information
Codes and Standards
Date Range
Showing 1 - 20 of 27 results.
SORT BY
Decisions
Simunovich Fisheries Ltd, Simunovich, and Wilkinson and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2003-185, 2003-186, 2003-187
2003-185–187

Assignment Special. Investigation of scampi fishing industry with allegations of corruption. Complainants’ application for production of documents and affidavits.

Decisions
CD and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2003-075
2003-075

Assignment. In interview on mental health system, complainant's family was mentioned despite prior agreement not to. Upheld (privacy). Orders ($1500 compensation to complainant, $750 contribution to complainant’s expenses).

Decisions
Beattie and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2003-046
2003-046

The Assignment. Film showed sexual behaviour and nudity, and violence. Upheld (children's interests). Not upheld (good taste and decency, violence). No order.

Decisions
Boyce and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2002-169
2002-169

Assignment. Election special analysed the Auckland electorates and included statement about student loans. Upheld (accuracy). No order.

Decisions
Schwabe and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2002-013
2002-013

Assignment. Preview of item on state of New Zealand railways had interviewees using mildly offensive language. Not upheld (good taste and decency).

Decisions
George and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2001-026
2001-026

Assignment: "The Parent Trap". Documentary about divorce and men who feel disadvantaged by the family law system. Not upheld (balance).

Decisions
Phillips, on behalf of the Heperi family, and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2001-018
2001-018

Assignment. Documentary about child abuse used archival footage of Heperi family without seeking permission. Not upheld (fairness, privacy).

Decisions
Boyce and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-149, 2000-150
2000-149–150

Items on One News and Tonight examined what was described as new evidence relating to the William Sutch trial, in the context of an Assignment programme that same evening which reviewed the historic charges against Dr Sutch. Upheld (fairness: extracts used must be 'a true reflection and not a distortion': action taken insufficient). Not upheld (accuracy: evidence was 'new'). Order (broadcast of statement).

Decisions
Smith and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-127
2000-127

Assignment. Programme re-examined allegations that Dr William Sutch had engaged in espionage. Not upheld (accuracy, fairness, balance, impartiality).

Decisions
Urlich and Hackwell and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-120, 2000-121
2000-120–121

Assignment: "Threats and Promises". Programme examined government defence policy. Complaints that programme was unbalanced. Not upheld: majority (balance). Not upheld because not applicable (fairness: a true reflection and not a distortion).

Decisions
The Tobacco Institute of New Zealand Ltd and Television New Zealand Ltd - 2000-036
2000-036

Assignment: "Up in Smoke". Documentary about cigarette smoking in New Zealand discussed health risks and consequences of smoking, and focused particularly on the effects on Maori and young smokers. Not upheld (law and order, balance, fairness, accuracy, discrimination and denigration).

Decisions
Walker and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1999-176
1999-176

Assignment. Documentary examined a theory which linked those who abused animals in their youth to violent offences in later years and included video footage of teenage boys tormenting a dog. It was explained that they had filmed the video themselves. Not upheld (violence). Subsumed (good taste and decency).

Decisions
Voters' Voice (Inc) and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1998-166
1998-166

Assignment. Item depicted a public meeting of the Act Party in Tauranga. The reporter stated that Act staff had told the broadcaster after the meeting that supporters of the group, Voters’ Voice, had given each Act MP a copy of the recent speeches of Pauline Hansen. Not upheld (accuracy).

Decisions
Mitchell and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1998-122
1998-122

Assignment. Programme broadcast at at 6.30pm focused on trial of Malcolm Rewa, accused and found guilty of a large number of sexual attacks on women, and included material that was "explicit and distressing". It replaced an advertised Our World programme, a programme watched unsupervised by many children. Upheld (children's interests, violence). Not upheld (good taste and decency). No order.

Decisions
New Zealand Minerals Industry Association and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1998-105
1998-105

Best of Assignment. The programme was initially broadcast on Assignment in April 1997, and the rescreening in December updated the information contained in the original broadcast by the use of a postscript in the form of a studio piece at the end of the broadcast. Complaint that the programme reflected a negatively biased view of the industry, and the postscript was inadequate in view of the events which had occurred in recent months. Not upheld (balance, accuracy, fairness, responsible programming).

Decisions
Maternity Services Consumer Council and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1998-041, 1998-042
1998-041–042

Assignment. Programme featured disputes between medical specialists and midwives about maternity care. It concentrated on a couple whose child had died, and their midwife. Upheld: majority (fairness). Not upheld (privacy). No order.

Decisions
Smits and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1998-005, 1998-006
1998-005–006

Assignment. Documentary about West Auckland used the murder of a young woman by her partner to illustrate the theme of the "Wild West". Complaint that item lacked balance and that by showing and identifying her, it had breached the privacy of the murdered woman's young daughter. Not upheld (balance, privacy).

Decisions
Shadbolt and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1998-017
1998-017

Assignment. Programme examined the background to a brutal murder in West Auckland and used it as the basis of a documentary about that region. The programme asked whether the area's "Wild West" image reflected deep social problems. Former mayor of Waitemata City, Tim Shadbolt, complained that the programme suggested that West Auckland had developed a reputation for "larrikin behaviour" during his mayoralty. Not upheld (fairness, balance).

Decisions
Friends of the Earth (New Zealand) and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1996-167
1996-167

Assignment. The programme explored the economic crisis facing traditional sheep and cattle farmers and mentioned some of the land use alternatives to traditional farming adopted by some farmers. Complaint that the programme omitted any reference to the alternative of organic farming. Not upheld (balance).

Decisions
New Zealand Conservative Party and Television New Zealand Ltd - 1996-161, 1996-162
1996-161–162

Assignment, Meet the Press. The first of these programmes profiled and analysed three of the minor political parties, the second interviewed the leaders of two of these parties. The New Zealand Conservative Party complained about not being included. Not upheld (balance, accuracy).

1 2